Macgiavelli's Relationship To The Coca-Cola Company Research Paper

Macgiavelli's Relationship To The Coca-Cola Company - Research Paper Example The current business world is becoming absolute first, and the client's interest is exceptionally expanding and getting increasingly modern. The current organizations are confronting a major test on the best way to adapt to this complex custom interest; the main developing innovation, competency and assets. For the organizations to explain the above difficulties, there is requirement for a collusion that is the main answer for the primary developing business sector. The vital partnership will empower the organizations to get to new markets, get bleeding edge innovation, extend geographic reach, and adapt to the principal rivalry being experienced (Hoskisson et al., 186). These partnerships have permitted most associations to contend all the more viably and have additionally empowered these organizations to be in a decent state with the expanding mechanical and authoritative complexities that have as of now become an integral factor in the today’s showcase. Vital union has contributed in changing the dynamic and structure of the today’s rivalry in the entire world. When all is said in done, vital coalition is whereby two organizations meet up to acquire a typical intrigue which probably won't be anything but difficult to get independently (Botten, 298). MACGIAVELLI'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE COCA-COLA COMPANY The Coca-Cola Company has wandered into the union methodology to exceed his opponents in the market. Be that as it may, as indicated by Machiavelli, a sovereign who is independent is better of as he is consistently prepared to meet any adversary at the combat zone. This is on the grounds that he is constantly outfitted with his military. The contention is a logical inconsistency with the methodology the Coca-Cola Company is taking. This methodology of shaping unions is helping the organization to thrive in the today’s showcase.

Barry Goldwater Essay Research Paper In 1981 free essay sample

Barry Goldwater Essay, Research Paper In 1981, Senator Barry Goldwater announced that such good issues as fetus removal, erotica, and school petition should non to be the worry of American specialists. He put together this case with respect to a premiss imagined and held adored by the designers of the Constitution. He established his reason in an approach that has forestalled seizure in this state since the inception as different states have toppled for insufficiency of connection. Representative Goldwater # 8217 ; s words reverberated the truly portion of a hypothesis referred to only as the division of chapel and region. Our state depends on its specialists to be without impact from any individual confidence. Only as we would non irritate the entirety of different races in the state by asserting one predominant, so should we non hold one confidence right. This degage way forestalls shaky and non-gainful battle. Moreover, it is non the obligation of the effectively above water American administrative framework to arrange profound quality, nor is it that of the Moral Majority. We will compose a custom article test on Barry Goldwater Essay Research Paper In 1981 or on the other hand any comparative point explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page This obligation lies only with the family. It is the obligation of family unit to transfuse upon its youngster a cardinal feeling of right and erroneous. More every now and again than non, a child is educated to follow to some arrangement of good rules. No total of rule law can be useful on the off chance that one is non educated to regard its approval. Why instruct that child to fit in with models set by specialists, in this way burthening said specialists with the endeavor of raising its state? s juvenile, when that kid, through legitimate guidance, can be endowed to take for himself the best possible alternative? It is the disappointment of the advanced familial foundation to flexibly this basic guidance to our state? s youngster that prompts the mounting prominence of associations like the Moral Majority and Conservative Coalition. It would look that these equivalent bombed American family units have selected to defe r the bringing up of their children to the Moral Majority. It is from this traffic circle bolster that the â€Å"Majority† infers force and impact. The United States values the notoriety of being enormously differentiated. Representative Goldwater farther brings up that it is the contribution of the Moral Majority to disband all purposes of position however it? s ain. Given that the populace is thought up more than only Christians this is in no way an executable alternative. These associations need to acknowledge the way that no undertaking the aggregate of political virility gathered, the state wherein they work was based on a rather thorough arrangement of rules refering the whipping of the privileges of others, and regardless of anything else no noble American is heading out to kick back and be forcibly fed an outside feeling of profound quality. Be that as it may, that acknowledgment is only one of a not insignificant rundown of uncouth waking ups in look for these schemes. Any rule law for which they decide to buttonhole is verifiably illegal insofar as it confines itself to just one otherworldly purpose of position. In the event that imaginative action is to be educated in school, educational systems must be patched up to see each hypothesis in the world. All Gods must be appealed to if requests are to be an obligatory segment of the school twenty-four hours. We should deny the force from these personal responsibility bunches before we lose the ability to make so. To rehash, this should simply be possible if the common American family unit one time again willingly volunteers to be the ethical guide of our youngster. Only issue can be discovered when looking to others to demonstrate the hereafters of today? s youngster. Has such a great amount of changed in 15 mature ages that we may stop focusing specialists endeavors on monetary stableness and outside close to home businesss in order to conciliate the requests of the otherworldly right when those requests are of a private sort and have no cogency on an open graduated table? The answer is a resounding no.

Jim Morrison Essay -- Biography

Hopkins and Sugerman (2006) and Stone (1991) built up the picture of Morrison as a shaman and as Lizard King dependent on the turn of events, by Morrison, of his job as a shaman and the picture of the Lizard King. This picture was the â€Å"existing esteem structure† of Morrison at the hour of his passing, in spite of endeavors made by Morrison to change this picture. As the â€Å"the manner by which the all out picture develops decides or if nothing else limits the bearing of future growth,† Hopkins and Sugerman (2006) and Stone (1991) were working inside the parameters of Morrison's picture. Along these lines, the picture of Morrison as a shaman and Lizard King turned out to be inside lucid and reliable through redundancy and served to compose both chronicled and after death thoughts regarding Morrison, overriding reality. Subside Jan Margry (2008, 145), in â€Å"The Pilgrimage to Jim Morrison's Grave at Pã ¨re Lachaise Cemetery: the Social Construction of Sacred Space,† composes of Stone (1991) â€Å"[giving] a totally different impulse to this mythologizing [of Morrison].† â€Å"The film† composes Margry (2008, 145), â€Å"partly affirmed the current picture however included new, incredible iconographies and narratives.† Famous memoirs of Morrison, distributed since Hopkins and Sugerman (2006), have stressed the mythic ramifications of Morrison's biography, for example, the improvement of mythos encompassing Morrison during his life, his baffling demise and the advancement of a clique following, including journey to his grave in Paris (see Davis 2005; Densmore 1990; Henke 2007; Hopkins 2010; Mazerak 1999; Riordan and Prochnicky 2006). The essentialness of understanding Morrison as a shaman identifies with the birthplaces of attribution. Morrison, through self-portrayal as a shaman, induced the task of a strict air sur... ...onal self-sufficiency and prototype hero debauchery. As Morrison has not been dependent upon an investigation of commodification, as has Presley, at that point the investigation of Morrison as an item, and its religion to thought of him as a â€Å"religious figure,† warrants future examination. Eventually, to comprehend the advancement of a strict air, encompassing Morrison, and Morrison as a â€Å"religious figure,† all parts of his life and picture must be represented. Generally, his life, self-proliferated fantasy, picture, demise and potential as a product. After death, his common misconception, journey to his gravesite and commodification of his picture. Morrison as a shaman and Lizard King is just one purpose behind his strict quality; its commitment to the advancement of the common misconception, alongside the focal qualities contained in his picture, added to the possibility of Morrison as a â€Å"religious figure.†

10 Ways to Render Sentences More Concise

10 Ways to Render Sentences More Concise 10 Ways to Render Sentences More Concise 10 Ways to Render Sentences More Concise By Mark Nichol This post subtleties different procedures for decreasing and rearranging sentences. 1. Sentence Combination Stay away from sequential sentences that end and start, individually, with a similar word or expression as happens here: A typical method to follow the present condition of frameworks is observing execution measurements. Execution measurements show how resources are performing at the exchange level. In such cases, supplant the period between them with a comma and erase the second emphasis of the word or expression with which: â€Å"A normal approach to follow the present condition of frameworks is observing execution measurements, which show how resources are performing at the exchange level.† 2. Consolidating by Subordination At the point when a sentence incorporates two continuous action word phrases, consider changing over one to a subordinate proviso. For instance, note how the subject of this sentence is trailed by two proclamations of reality: The eminent tea is an image of the city’s thoughtful neighborliness and is frequently served in a glass to show its jade-green shading. The principal proclamation can without much of a stretch be subsumed into the principle provision as an incidental expression: â€Å"The famous tea, an image of the city’s generous accommodation, is regularly served in a glass to show its jade-green color.† 3. Incorporation of Clauses Here, an early on subordinate proviso sets up a pointlessly tedious sentence: For medicinal services elements with comparable classes of clients, they might have the option to diminish the general assessment exertion by applying the portfolio approach. The provision is effortlessly incorporated into the fundamental statement by excluding for and treating â€Å"health care entities,† as opposed to they, as the sentence’s subject: â€Å"Health care elements with comparable classes of clients might have the option to diminish the general assessment exertion by applying the portfolio approach.† 4. Denominalization Nominalization is the difficulty of exposition by utilizing things while utilizing the action word type of that thing, or modifying the sentence to dispose of the requirement for a thing, creates all the more clear, compact writing; things, obviously, are indispensable to composition at the same time, particularly on account of formal things with so much components as - ation, they can be manhandled in the administration of passing on power. This sentence isn't excessively formal, however it is wordier than would normally be appropriate: Besides, organizations are taking reinforcements of the creation applications and putting away them for inconclusive periods. Denominalization-truly, â€Å"unnaming†-is just an extravagant method of saying â€Å"rephrasing to wipe out nouns.† Note that in this sentence, the thing reinforcements can be changed over to an action word, rendering the action word taking unnecessary, and the last expression can be consolidated by changing the modifier uncertain into an intensifier, which empowers cancellation of the thing time frames: â€Å"Furthermore, organizations are backing up the creation applications and putting away them indefinitely.† The accompanying sentence is a case of an announcement with a twofold decker nominalization: The board may think that its advantageous to participate in a discourse on an occasional premise with respect to the organization’s strategy. As in the past model, single word effectively replaces an expression â€Å"on an occasional basis† can be decreased to intermittently: â€Å"Management may think that its useful to occasionally participate in an exchange with respect to the organization’s policy.† Be that as it may, further decrease is accomplished by supplanting the expression â€Å"engage in a dialogue† with an equal word: â€Å"Management may think that its gainful to occasionally talk about the organization’s policy.† 5. Utilizing Terms Rather Than Definitions One technique to accomplish brevity is to abstain from portraying something by characterizing it; note the clarification in the accompanying sentence: He was inclined to committing humiliating errors out in the open. Here, the people conduct can be portrayed with a term that encapsulates the definition: â€Å"He was inclined to submitting false pas.† 6. Cancellation of Expletives The exclamations â€Å"there is† and â€Å"there are† are poor substitutes for a solid subject; note how the accompanying sentence gets looking feeble so far: There are barely any, money and bookkeeping offices that are not encountering some type of extraordinary change. Exclamations need not be extracted for each situation, yet limit their utilization by erasing such expressions for the clear thing or thing phrase that follows (and erase the related that that shows up later in the sentence): â€Å"Few, assuming any, money and bookkeeping offices are not encountering some type of extraordinary change.† 7. Maintaining a strategic distance from Tautology Repetition is excess or redundancy, for example, appeared here: Would you be able to rehash that? To rehash is to accomplish something, so this sentence is comparable to â€Å"Could you state that again again?† Indicate the activity somehow: â€Å"Could you state that again?† or, all the more compactly, â€Å"Could you rehash that?† 8. Utilizing Brief Modifiers While adjusting a thing to give more data about it, utilize a first descriptive word or phrasal descriptor as opposed to an all-inclusive expression following the thing. The accompanying sentence shows utilization of a verbose adjusting phrase: She offered a clarification that was brief and to the point. This sentence can be taken care of by finding the depiction of the clarification before the thing: â€Å"She offered a brief, to-the-point explanation.† 9. Extracting Single Words Now and again, diminishing a sentence by only single word improves it, as appeared in the accompanying models: As opposed to evaluating the entirety of the agreements, select a delegate test to survey. In the expression â€Å"all of,† of is commonly unnecessary: â€Å"Rather than evaluating all the agreements, select an agent test to assess.† How is innovation assisting with changing the manner in which older individuals are thought about? In the expression â€Å"helping to,† to is superfluous: How is innovation helping change the manner in which old individuals are thought about? That is the most irritating mistake I have ever observed, and furthermore the most predominant. Likewise, when it promptly follows and, is repetitive: That is the most irritating blunder I have ever observed, and the most common. 10. Maintaining a strategic distance from Prolixity Forgo colorful, verbose depictions. The accompanying sentence is an extraordinary case of liberal tedium, yet except if one is purposely prolix in the administration of silliness, be cautious about getting control over exorbitantly fancy composition: One may with the most extreme certainty article to win in a discussion in which one attests that having one’s own methods for vehicular movement offers one more noteworthy adaptability than open transportation gives in the matter of movement to one’s spot of learning or business or to social events. Pare such excessively confused organization: â€Å"It’s simple to win a contention that having one’s own vehicle makes it simpler to get the chance to class or work or to meet companions than if one uses open transportation.† Need to improve your English in a short time a day? Get a membership and begin getting our composing tips and activities every day! Continue learning! Peruse the Grammar classification, check our well known posts, or pick a related post below:The Royal Order of Adjectives Disappointed + PrepositionCareful with Words Used as Noun and Verb

How Capitalism Beat Communism/Socialism

Chapter by chapter guide Introduction Analytical part Conclusion References Footnotes Introduction Nowadays, it would be very difficult to concoct the specific number of distributed books and articles that manage the subject of what was a definitive explanation behind Soviet Union’s breakdown in 1991. This somewhat clarifies why the disassembling of a ‘evil empire’ has been tended to from a wide range of points of view, which regularly infer ideological and even accidental nature of such a dismantling.Advertising We will compose a custom exposition test on How Capitalism Beat Communism/Socialism explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More Even however most of analysts do demand propriety of use of in particular monetary way to deal with managing the topic, there are as yet numerous individuals who believe that the real explanation, why in 1991 Soviet Union had crumpled like a pile of cards, needs to accomplish more with philosophy then with financial ma tters. For instance, in his book Beissinger (2002) endeavors speak as far as possible of USSR as a definitive outcome of the way that, regardless of their Communist talk, Soviet authorities never stopped declaring Russian majestic qualities: â€Å"As the Soviet Union crumbled, it came to be broadly perceived as a global domain. In this sense, the main problem that should be clarified is the manner by which a nation once all around interpreted as a state came to be all around denounced as an empire† (6). By and by, the real piece of information as to USSR’s breakdown is being contained in the very shortening †The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Clearly, Socialism as political teaching dependent on the reason of social populism, just negates the equitably existing laws of nature, which is the reason everything influenced by Socialism turns out to be brief. It is essential to comprehend the moving power behind universe’s working, as we probably am aware i t, is the difference between lively possibilities. As indicated by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, the measure of entropy known to mankind is geometrically proportionate the degree of energy’s dissemination all through the universe. Given the way that human social orders are basically material, The Second Law of Thermodynamics concerns them too. In this manner, it is specifically the separation in enthusiastic possibilities, which makes life conceivable. In human social orders, lively separation is being characterized by the absence of assets (imbalance), experienced by its individuals, which in its turn, fills in as the essential power behind civilizational progress. Then again, a definitive objective of Soviet ‘welfare state’ has consistently been the equivalent circulation of assets among society’s individuals, because of contemplations of ‘fairness’. This is actually the motivation behind why USSR was bound to crumple †in pretty muc h every general public, the working of which is being worried about the recognition of Socialist standards, the drawn out continuation of social, social and logical advancement gets unthinkable, as the thought of uniformity is equivalent to the idea of lively death.Advertising Looking for paper on political theories? We should check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In really ‘fair’ society, as Soviet society once seemed to be, individuals are being denied of an improvement to enjoy socially profitable exercises. In this paper, we will plan to investigate the legitimacy of a previous explained theory significantly further by uncovering the arrangement of target preconditions, which had represented Soviet ‘classless’ society’s disappointment in showdown with its principle rival †the Capitalist society of United States. Expository part Even however numerous political researchers allude to Thomas More’s book Utopia as with the end goal that just officially identifies with the applied reason of Socialism, the nearby perusing of this book calls attention to something inverse, in light of the fact that in Utopia, More had prevailing with regards to detailing the two most significant standards of Socialist state’s association, which would later be seen by Soviet authorities. These standards can be delineated as follows: 1) Government’s dynamic contribution in dealing with the economy, 2) Government’s strategy of uncovering citizens’ endeavor towards advancement as something absolutely ‘immoral’, in light of the fact that it is specifically on the record of citizens’ ‘selfishness’ that the presence of imbalance is conceivable: â€Å"The more extravagant sort are frequently trying to bring the recruit of workers lower, by their fake practices, however by the laws which they acquire to be made to that effect† (1516, 118) . This is the motivation behind why, despite the fact that More depicted Utopians as individuals who used to enjoy an assortment of financial exercises, these exercises show up being denied of any coherent sense, at all. As Shephard (1995) had put it: â€Å"The principle motivation behind Utopian exchange gives off an impression of being the aggregation of their crowd of gold and silver. Since these valuable metals are useless in Utopia†¦ Utopians’ mercantilistic exchanging arrangements appear perverse† (846). Along these lines, even as far back as in sixteenth century, the calculated deception of Communism/Socialism has been uncovered in the very work of this ideology’s starting theoretician. In any case, it was not up until the downfall of Soviet Union in late twentieth century that More and Marx’s Communist thoughts were uncovered as completely hostile to logical in the domain practice. The purpose behind this is straightforward †the possibil ity that economy should the subject of legislative administration violates the laws of nature. Understand that the subjects of economy are a huge number of individuals †each with its own financial advantages. Similarly as one’s body, economy is a life form, comprising of operational cells. Also, similarly as a specific cell of one’s body can't ‘steer’ the remainder of cells, government can't ‘steer’ the economy, basically on the grounds that it itself never stops to remain economy’s subject. While attempting to ‘govern’ economy, socialistically disapproved of government officials basically go about as body’s malignant cells †they pulverize the entire assemblage of economics.Advertising We will compose a custom paper test on How Capitalism Beat Communism/Socialism explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More The historical backdrop of Soviet Union (particularly throughout twentieth century’s seventies and eighties) demonstrates the full legitimacy of such our proposal. Similarly as it was the situation in More’s Utopia, the working of Soviet economy has been solidly founded on the standard of state’s one-sided responsibility for resources and work. For instance, up until 1961, Soviet laborers, working in aggregate homesteads, were even illegal to hold travel papers of their own nation †they were basically state-possessed slaves. Also, as we probably am aware from history, the working of subjugation based economies has consistently been absolutely wasteful. One may think about what was the real improvement for Soviet residents to try and trouble to work? Soviet authority purposeful publicity responded to that question from rather a moralistic point of view. As per it, the motivation behind why residents were required to be diligent employees is that they should be really worried about profiting their nation, as their preeminent need, to the detriment of disregarding their own monetary advantages. As Soviet high-positioning authorities never stopped suggesting †since Soviet residents were blessed with firmly characterized mutual mindedness, it was just normal for them to see encompassing real factors through basically collective focal points †consequently, making their reality very contrary with the Capitalist soul of independence. It is turn; this caused the very motivation behind Soviet economy’s working to be worried about the issues of profound quality, rather than be worried about age of a business benefit, as it is the situation in Capitalist nations. While alluding to the points of interest of Soviet life, Horowitz (1989) states: â€Å"Soviet Socialism depends on a strict social ideology†¦ It settles upon a to a great extent, in spite of the fact that not only, common view that mutual living would make everything from sexual undertakings to youngster raising to work designs easier and nobler† ( 110). Soviet residents were urged to work for peanuts, while determining a passionate fulfillment out of the way that in Soviet society there was no ‘Capitalist exploitation’ and keeping in mind that hoping to accept that administratively structured financial approaches were implied encourage ‘equality’ inside the general public. By the by, as we have called attention to before, there is basically no real way to make a specific political belief system practically powerful for whatever length of time that such ideology’s very reason abuses the laws of nature. What's more, the preeminent law of nature, with respect to economy, demands that there can be just a single target explanation behind individuals to enjoy financial exercises, in any case †the possibility of producing a fiscal benefit. As it was properly recommended by Geva (2001): â€Å"Business is relied upon to do whatever is essential so as to succeed, and isn't required to be worried a bout dynamic profound quality. Business is a one-dimensional, absolutely benefit looking for big business. Benefit isn't simply organized; it is raised to the avoidance of all other interests† (585).Advertising Searching for exposition on political theories? We should check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Find out More In this way, the constant presence of Soviet Union was just feasible for whatever length of time that country’s residents were being saved of a chance to analyze their hey

The Well-Readheads Year in Books

The Well-Readheads Year in Books RJS: Reunited and it feels so good! I’ve called you out of your book cave today, Muffin, so we can talk about our favorite books of the year. I don’t know about you, but I’ve had a killer reading year, filled with squeeing and underlining and OMGYOUHAVETOREADTHIS-ing. Ready to break it down? LH: I am so ready to talk about books I am going to burst. My reading year has been AMAZY. (FYI: Amazy is a combination of ‘crazy’ and ‘amazing,’ which I thought I invented, but when I Googled it, it turns out it’s the name of an Indonesian fried chicken franchise. True story: Their slogan is “The Most Wanted Crispy.” Don’t care I’m still using it.) Anyway, back in June, we did a round-up of our favorites from the first six months. And now we’re going to talk about the second half of our reading year RJS: June feels like so far away, I can’t even remember what I put in that first round-up. I’m not gonna lie, there might be some repeats here, but only because the books are so good that they deserve to be talked about incessantly. In a good way. Not like we could ever be annoying talking about books. Let’s start with the numbers. What’s your year-end total going to look like you, you book-hungry woman? LH: Oh no, a public shaming! I was shooting for 250, but it looks like I’m going to end between 210 and 220. My year got crazy busy, but it’s all been awesome. RJS: I’mma need a minute to wrap my head around how this could ever be shameful. I’ll be landing right around 100, which is where I always land, no matter what I do or how I change up my reading habits. I’ll try not to feel insecure about the fact that I’m drawing on a pool half the size you’re drawing on. On the upside, a HUGE percentage of the books I read this year were great. I remember ending 2011 feeling like it was sort of a “meh” year for books, but 2012 has been radtastic. LH: Fo sho. I loved even more books in the last six months of this year. I’m just going to start spouting them off, starting with The Middlesteins by Jami Attenberg. This is a fantastic unmooshy look at a family, centered around the group’s obese matriarch. I loved it so much. And it’s driving the sales of Chinese food the way The Avengers drove sales of shawarma. Well, close to it. RJS: I haven’t read that one! Seating Arrangements by Maggie Shipstead made me want to tie a cardigan around my shoulders, move to the Cape, and start going by “Buffy.” Summery and fun without being fluffy, it was just the scandalicious, socially satirical read I wanted for vacation. LH: I loved that one, as well. And a few more great debuts that I loved: How To Get Into the Twin Palms by Karolina Waclawiak, about a woman who desperately wants to get inside the Russian nightclub she spies on from her balcony; Love Slave by Jennifer Spiegel, about an office temp in 1995, who writes a column for an alt weekly that details her journey through the possibilities of love; and Shine Shine Shine by Lydia Netzer, which I love explaining this premise is about a bald pregnant housewife who is stuck dealing with her autistic son and dying mother while her husband is on a space shuttle trip to populate the moon with robots. When people say it’s all been done before, I emphatically wave this book. Oh, and The Danger of Proximal Alphabets by Kathleen Alcott, about a relationship between a woman and two brothers. It’s a wonderful book even just saying the title is wonderful. RJS: Co-freaking-sign for Shine Shine Shine. Now, I’m pretty hesitant to say that a book changed my life, but Quiet by Susan Cain re-framed how I think about my personality and gave me a whole new perspective on how I work and how I socialize. Also, Alibis: Essays on Elsewhere by André Aciman is incredible. It technically came out in 2011, but I don’t care. I’m sneaking it in here because I’ve never read anything that nailed so perfectly what it is we’re looking for when we travel. LH: In the nonfiction category, I have to say Full Body Burden by Kristen Iversen gave me chills. It’s about how Iversen grew up near the secret Rocky Flats nuclear facility in Colorado, and all the terrible things that happened both at the facility, and to the area and its inhabitants (both two and four-legged.) Also, Brain On Fire: My Month of Madness by Susannah Cahalan made me feel like *I* was going crazy. Cahalan had a dangerous, undiagnosed illness in her brain that made her start acting like she needed to be institutionalized. Seriously scary, eye-opening stuff, these books. RJS: I burned through Brain on Fire as well, with equal parts fascination and terror. On a much lighter note, I really loved Julie Klam’s Friendkeeping, a collection of essays about making, keeping, and occasionally losing friends. It’s warm, funny, insightful, and exactly what I want from a book like that. And in the books-about-books category, Lauren Leto’s Judging a Book By Its Lover gave me ever so many nerdpurrs. LH: I heart Julie so much she’s so damn funny. Another humorous book I loved this year was How Not To Read: Harnessing the Power of a Literature-Free Life by Dan Wilbur. Dan lists a bunch of reasons why you shouldn’t read another bookafter his. It’s very funny. And it doesn’t really pose a threat to books, because you can’t take Dan seriously. I mean, c’mon he lives in a hollowed-out tree in Central Park, pursuing his lifelong dream to be a house-elf. Or maybe he’s a comedian. One of these things is true. RJS: I guess that’s sort of self-help, like, if you need more free time because you read too much? On a more serious note, and probably the first time a self-help-y book has ended up in my year-end favorites, Brené Brown’s Daring Greatly deserves to be talked about. Really excellent insights, based on years of social work and research (hooray for data!), about taking risks and going “all in” in our friendships, relationships, and work lives. I can’t stop recommending it. LH: I have heard great things about it! I am now going to rattle off a whole slew of titles technically considered as books for a younger audience, but are AMAZING reading for all ages: Shadow and Bone by Leigh Bardugo, The Girl Who Fell Beneath Fairyland and Led the Revels There by Catherynne Valente, Seraphina by Rachel Hartman, Unwind by Neil Shusterman, Liar and Spy by Rebecca Stead, The Year of the Beasts by Cecil Castellucci and Ask the Passengers by A.S. King. I loved all of these so, so much. RJS: Ask the Passengers is the only YA I read this yearKing tends to be my one YA pick every yearand damn. I read a bunch of short story collections I loved this year. My turn to rattle! Megan Mayhew Bergman’s Birds of a Lesser Paradise takes the cake. Then there’s Diving Belles by Lucy Woodcreepy and atmospheric and nearly perfect. Junot Diaz tore my heart to pieces with This Is How You Lose Her. Oh, and The Paris Review’s Object Lessons collection was wonderful! LH: I was going to do short stories next, and yes, Megan was on it! I loved the Diaz, as well, and holy cats did I love Battleborn by Claire Vaye Watkins. We’re running out of space, so lemme throw a few more at you real fast: May We Be Forgiven by A.M. Homes, The Lighthouse Road by Peter Geye, The Dog Stars by Peter Hellerand I just want to publicly announce that the new Kate Atkinson that comes out in April, Life After Life, is SO amazing. Truly, it’s brill, and if it doesn’t sell tons and tons of copies next year, I will eat James Patterson. That’s how strongly I feel about this book. RJS: More that I loved: The Yellow Birds by Kevin Powersa perfectly taut, incredibly affecting novel about the Iraq War. How to Think More About Sex by Alain de Bottonit isn’t so much about thinking MORE about sex as it is about thinking about sex more effectively/healthily/adaptively. Magic Hours by Tom Bissellexcellent essays about creativity and the creative life. Home by Toni Morrisonnot my favorite of her oeuvre but still fantastic, and re-reading all of her earlier novels in the run-up to it was a defining experience in my reading year. I’m sure there are more, but these are stand-outs. My current pick for Early 2013 Release That Needs to Be a Big Fucking Deal is Fiona Maazel’s Woke Up Lonely (Graywolf Press, April). It’s, well, it’s everything I want a novel to be. LH: Okay, my little ginger kitten, to recap: SQUEEEEEEE SQUEEEEEEE WE LOVE BOOKS!!!! That about cover it? RJS: Girl, you know it does. Until 2013, The Well-Readheads are over and out. *drops mic* LH: *fist bump* Sign up to Unusual Suspects to receive news and recommendations for mystery/thriller readers.

Essay on Materialism

Essay on Materialism Materialism refers to a collection of personality traits. The contemporary world is full of people who possess materialistic trait. They have a belief that owning and acquisition of the right properties is the vital ingredients of happiness. These people think that success is judged by the things individual possesses. Philosophers and theologians have been complaining for long that materialism is contrary to moral life. More often the goal of gaining material wealth is regarded as empty and in result it prevents a person from being involved in a normal life. The consequences of pursuing materialistic lifestyle are the inability to reach the state of happiness in one’s life. The empirical studies, carried out to find the correlation between happiness and materialism, have confirmed negative correlation between the two. Being materialistic is bad, as it leads to the creation of the world of difference in the way people treat other human beings. The materialistic people hardly treat others as their equals and often go extra mile to show off their wealth. They hardly care about anyone but themselves and frequently tend to exploit and trample people through the process of a dog eat dog world. It is, therefore, important for people to follow the teachings of the Bible and become moral. The little things we possess, we need to share with the poor as this will ensure equality in the society. Materialism nurtures corruption and causes the society to be impoverished. Materialistic people use every available means to ensure that the rest of the people in the society remain poor. The aspect of materialism is more pronounced in the third world countries, where leaders are driven by greed and in the process embezzle public funds to maintain their status.